On 14 August 2010 23:09, Karl Berry <k...@freefriends.org> wrote: > [reducing to bug-gnulib] > > unhappy with code-generated documentation. > > We can have code-generated documentation *if* you (or someone) writes > rms with a detailed explanation of the situation (I can review any > draft). He always (to my knowledge) has had various > requests/recommendations for how to proceed. So it's not forbidden, but > the details of every situation seem to be different, and my guesses > about how to handle them have sometimes been wrong, so I can't be the > advisor :).
Unsurprisingly, the work on regex.texi is turning out to be rather more time-consuming than I first hoped, so I may well end up passing on this other bit altogether. IOW, don't expect anything more from me on this unless I explicitly say I'm going to work on it. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
