[reducing to bug-gnulib]

    unhappy with code-generated documentation. 

We can have code-generated documentation *if* you (or someone) writes
rms with a detailed explanation of the situation (I can review any
draft).  He always (to my knowledge) has had various
requests/recommendations for how to proceed.  So it's not forbidden, but
the details of every situation seem to be different, and my guesses
about how to handle them have sometimes been wrong, so I can't be the
advisor :).

karl

Reply via email to