Simon Josefsson wrote: >>> The only thing that is missing is to make it easy for maintainers to put >>> something in cfg.mk that disables some checks they don't care about, >>> alternatively list the checks they do care about. >> >> That's already possible. >> Just add names of unwanted checks to this variable in cfg.mk: >> >> local-checks-to-skip = ... > > That warrants a NEWS entry blurb that maintainers that use the > 'syntax-check' rule from maintainer-makefile may want to add tests they > don't care about to local-checks-to-skip. But I think that is > acceptable? People should be able to adapt these things.
I won't be complaining ;-) > Did you notice any other problem? Looking through the changes again, I > only see syntax-check related stuff, or harmless stuff. Your patch looked fine.
