Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > - it does not need to see a thread-aware errno, > > hence it does not need to compile with THREADCPPFLAGS. > > Not using a thread-aware errno from an application that indirectly use > thread through a library (which use thread-aware errno). Are you > completely sure this is safe?
Instead of discussing whether I'm "completely sure" and what we can "assume", can you show a test program that decides the question without any doubt? Bruno
