Le jeudi 21 août 2008 à 11:02 -0500, Matthew Woehlke a écrit : > Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > Le jeudi 21 août 2008 à 12:28 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : > >> Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > >>> Most program using the library currently don't (and probably won't) > >>> depend on GnuLib. They are not multithread programs, and in order to > >>> enable the library threaded features, we have to export correct > >>> CFLAGS/LIBS to theses application so that they can compile with > >>> threading enabled. > >> I agree regarding LIBS, but not regarding CPPFLAGS. If the program only > >> ever sees one thread, even though the library uses multiple threads behind > >> its back, > >> - it does not need to #include <pthread.h>, and > > > > I agree on this one. > > > >> - it does not need to see a thread-aware errno, > >> hence it does not need to compile with THREADCPPFLAGS. > > > > Not using a thread-aware errno from an application that indirectly use > > thread through a library (which use thread-aware errno). Are you > > completely sure this is safe? > > Ah, if the libc uses thread-safe errno and the program doesn't... > wouldn't that simply break errno? (i.e. libc would set the thread-safe > errno and the program would get back something different, and thus never > get the right errno when something goes wrong?) Maybe it would work on > some platforms, but I'd be really, *really* nervous about it working in > general.
I agree on this. Bruno, do you have any documentation that state otherwise? If no, can we assume the above and implement THREADCPPFLAGS? -- Yoann Vandoorselaere | Responsable R&D / CTO | PreludeIDS Technologies Tel: +33 (0)8 70 70 21 58 Fax: +33(0)4 78 42 21 58 http://www.prelude-ids.com