-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Karl Berry on 6/30/2007 12:02 PM: > Since modification of these files is not allowed by the consumer, > > It's always been allowed to "reformat" the licenses. What's not allowed > is to change the words.
So, just like had to be done with gpl.texi back when it was version 2, it is necessary to s/unnumbered/appendixsec/ if including the GPLv3 in an appendix of the manual? It would be nicer if gpl-3.0.texi behaved like fdl.texi, already prepared for inclusion in an appendix (or if texinfo could support some other subsectioning keyword that works regardless of whether the parent is a main body section or an appendix). Also, gpl-2.0.texi adds a @cindex entry, but gpl-3.0.texi lacks it. That means the manual's index is one entry shorter by upgrading to the new license; I'm wondering if that was intentional. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGjF4584KuGfSFAYARAlccAJ41DqlrXrEoaYGOMGIttVc/DckfHwCgvSkp ZREf9PzJ6Dq2NkSzv8KSzv0= =wVw9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
