Furthermore lgpl.texi creates an entry in the index, but gpl.texi doesn't. Also when you have a package partially under GPL, partially under LGPL, and partially under FDL, the title "Copying" of gpl.texi makes no sense any more. The other title "Library Copying" is nonsense as well, since RMS doesn't recomment the LGPL for libraries.
I'm using this patch: --- gnulib/doc/gpl.texi 2006-05-30 20:12:40.000000000 +0200 +++ gpl.texi 2006-04-12 00:57:38.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copying [EMAIL PROTECTED] GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] GNU GPL [EMAIL PROTECTED] GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL, GNU General Public License [EMAIL PROTECTED] License, GNU GPL @center Version 2, June 1991 @c This file is intended to be included in another file. --- gnulib/doc/lgpl.texi 2006-05-30 20:12:40.000000000 +0200 +++ lgpl.texi 2006-04-12 00:58:56.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Library Copying [EMAIL PROTECTED] GNU LGPL @appendixsec GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE - [EMAIL PROTECTED] LGPL, Lesser General Public License [EMAIL PROTECTED] LGPL, GNU Lesser General Public License [EMAIL PROTECTED] License, GNU LGPL @center Version 2.1, February 1999 @display
