Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The crucial trick here is the ability to compile lstat.c so that it uses > the original lstat function (be it #defined to lstat64 or not).
This idea looks good to me. But: > ! static int > ! rpl_lstat (const char *file, struct stat *sbuf) Surely the "static" should go? Also, while we're on the subject of lstat, what operating systems have the bug caught by AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK? If they are sufficiently old, perhaps we can simply remove the lstat module as well. That would be nice. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
