Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, while we're on the subject of lstat, what operating systems > have the bug caught by AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK? > If they are sufficiently old, perhaps we can simply remove > the lstat module as well. That would be nice.
It's going to be a few years. At least the following systems have the bug: Darwin 7.2.0 (MacOS 10.3.2) FreeBSD 5.0 IRIX 6.5 Solaris 7 Solaris 8 Solaris 9 They fail the test for whether lstat dereferences a symlink specified with a trailing slash... in that the configure-time test says `no' and does not define LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
