On 8/22/07, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At this point, since we are about to create a stable 4.4 branch where the > fts()-based find works, do we still need to worry about the home-grown > oldfind, which still has the bug?
Yes, for the time being, I think so. I believe that last time I measured it, the fts() based version was measurably slower. But the outstanding bug is problematic. > And do we go ahead and add the patch attached to this bug to the 4.3.x > testsuite, when it will only pass on one of the two implementations? Well, we could add it as an XFAIL bug. James.
