Update of bug #15384 (project findutils):
Status: None => Fixed
Fixed Release: None => 4.3.2
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #3:
Actually, the failure when '.' can't be found (for example, because a parent
is unsearchable) was introduced in 4.3.3; I'll open a separate report for
that.
This report deals with unreadable, but searchable parents. Indeed, fts makes
a difference:
$ mkdir -p private/d
$ touch private/d/a
$ ~/findutils-4.3.8/find/find /tmp/private/d
/tmp/private/d
/tmp/private/d/a
$ chmod a-rw /tmp/private
$ ~/findutils-4.3.8/find/find /tmp/private/d
/tmp/private/d
/tmp/private/d/a
$ ~/findutils-4.3.8/find/oldfind /tmp/private/d
/home/ericb/findutils-4.3.8/find/oldfind: `/tmp/private': Permission denied
At this point, since we are about to create a stable 4.4 branch where the
fts()-based find works, do we still need to worry about the home-grown
oldfind, which still has the bug?
And do we go ahead and add the patch attached to this bug to the 4.3.x
testsuite, when it will only pass on one of the two implementations?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?15384>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
