On Thursday 12 January 2006 07:25 pm, t takahashi wrote: > On 1/10/06, Sergey Poznyakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I will try. But 8 G still seems kind of small. Are there plans to change > > > this? > > > > This does not depend entirely on me. Cpio header layouts are standard > > perhaps this is a great opportunity for interested developers to > create a new -H type that: > > o has no limits, period > o is portable, period > o fully specifies all edge cases to the finest detail > (including trailing slash, relsyms, duplicate entries, permissions > on dirs, etc.) > o allows for future features (like marking pathnames for deletion) > o is simple enough to implement widely
I would add o has a crc, so that written data can be verified _______________________________________________ Bug-cpio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cpio
