https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28816
--- Comment #4 from Klaus Ziegler <kla...@haus-gisela.de> --- On 1/25/22 18:34, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28816 > > Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > CC| |nickc at redhat dot com > Resolution|--- |FIXED > > --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- > Hi Klaus, > > Thanks for reporting this problem. I have gone ahead and applied your > patch. > > Cheers > Nick > Hi Nick, much appreciated, however there are still errors building current binutilities on illumos in: sim/erc32/erc32.c sim/erc32/interf.c sim/erc32/sis.c they all miss <fcntl.h> on illumos, I patched them this way: --- sim/erc32/erc32.c.orig 2022-01-24 17:46:12.448917032 +0000 +++ sim/erc32/erc32.c 2022-01-26 08:46:31.264843513 +0000 @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include "sis.h" #include "sim-config.h" +#ifdef __sun +#include <fcntl.h> +#endif would such a patch be suitable for you? - if so I would just open a new ticket for the above three ones. The following errors are all related to gdb only, the next two object files do not compile using: gcc 7.5.0 however using: gcc 10.3.0 they compile fine without any warning: gdb/bt-utils.o: bt-utils.c: In function 'int libbacktrace_print(void*, gl_uintptr_t, const char*, int, const char*)': bt-utils.c:92:53: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'gl_uintptr_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=] snprintf (buf, sizeof (buf), "0x%" PRIxPTR " ", pc); gdb/sol-thread.o: sol-thread.c: In member function 'virtual void sol_thread_target::resume(ptid_t, int, gdb_signal)': sol-thread.c:417:20: error: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'ULONGEST {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=] save_ptid.tid ()); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ sol-thread.c: In member function 'virtual ptid_t sol_thread_target::wait(ptid_t, target_waitstatus*, target_wait_flags)': sol-thread.c:439:27: error: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'ULONGEST {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=] ptid_for_warning.tid ()); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^ sol-thread.c: In member function 'virtual std::__cxx11::string sol_thread_target::pid_to_str(ptid_t)': sol-thread.c:977:21: error: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'ULONGEST {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=] ptid.tid ()); ~~~~~~~~~~~^ sol-thread.c:980:33: error: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'ULONGEST {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=] ptid.tid (), lwp.lwp ()); ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ sol-thread.c:983:21: error: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'ULONGEST {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=] ptid.tid ()); unfortunately this one I'm unable to fix, and it does not compile using gcc7 or gcc10 on illumos: gdb/procfs.o: procfs.c: In member function 'virtual bool procfs_target::info_proc(const char*, info_proc_what)': procfs.c:3302:3: error: 'gdb_argv' was not declared in this scope gdb_argv built_argv (args); ^~~~~~~~ procfs.c:3302:3: note: suggested alternative: 'gdbarch' gdb_argv built_argv (args); ^~~~~~~~ gdbarch procfs.c:3303:20: error: 'built_argv' was not declared in this scope for (char *arg : built_argv) ^~~~~~~~~~ procfs.c:3303:20: note: suggested alternative: 'buildargv' for (char *arg : built_argv) ^~~~~~~~~~ buildargv This is it - after all of above ones are fixed current binutilities/gdb do compile fine on illumos, btw. I didn't knew that gdb is part of binutilities, if 2.38 will be released will it also contain this gdb release? Many Regards Klaus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
