https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > Hi Tom, > > I do not quite get this: > > > - int is_rnglists = strstr (section->name, "debug_rnglists") != NULL; > > + int is_rnglists = strstr (section->name, ".debug_rnglists") != NULL; > > The strstr() function locates a sub-string within a a longer string, > so won't both versions of the code above produce the same results ? > > I think that the reason that the test did not include the "." prefix > was that it is meant to work with compressed range list sections as > well, ie .zdebug_rnglists. Hi Nick, you're right, this is incorrect. Alan had the same comment. I've resubmitted here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115309.html Thanks, - Tom -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
