https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) Hi Tom, I do not quite get this: > - int is_rnglists = strstr (section->name, "debug_rnglists") != NULL; > + int is_rnglists = strstr (section->name, ".debug_rnglists") != NULL; The strstr() function locates a sub-string within a a longer string, so won't both versions of the code above produce the same results ? I think that the reason that the test did not include the "." prefix was that it is meant to work with compressed range list sections as well, ie .zdebug_rnglists. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
