https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24538
--- Comment #6 from mtest1 at testlt dot pl --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > Created attachment 11772 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi mtest1, > > Ah - yes - I know why I could not reproduce this problem now ... There is > a long standing problem with Fedora which makes it impossible to build > 32-bit binaries with address sanitization enabled. So my i386-elf > toolchain > actually has 64-bit executables in it rather than 32-bit ones. > > Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it resolves > the problem ? It may not work however as all it does is to (try to) stop > the illegal memory access inside i386_intel_simplify_register(). It does > not address the underlying problem of why an illegal register number was > being used in the first place. > > Cheers > Nick Hello Nick, your patch fixed the problem: $ ./as-i386 ~/tmp/result/ini386_intel_simplify_registerconfig_tc-i386-intel.c\:289/avx512f_vaes-wig.s_401709.out.min /home/shm/tmp/result/ini386_intel_simplify_registerconfig_tc-i386-intel.c:289/avx512f_vaes-wig.s_401709.out.min: Assembler messages: /home/shm/tmp/result/ini386_intel_simplify_registerconfig_tc-i386-intel.c:289/avx512f_vaes-wig.s_401709.out.min:3: Error: bignum invalid /home/shm/tmp/result/ini386_intel_simplify_registerconfig_tc-i386-intel.c:289/avx512f_vaes-wig.s_401709.out.min:3: Error: invalid register number May I ask you to let us know when you commit the patches? Best Regards! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
