Hi Nick I just tested a message like this:
#: coff-sh.c:2780 cofflink.c:2964 #, c-format msgid "%B: illegal symbol index %ld in relocs" msgstr "%A: advarsel: illegalt symbolindeks %ld i relokeringerne" Note how the translation contains an erroneous %A instead of the correct %B. This is accepted by msgfmt. Thus, the c-format flag cannot validate these codes. It also accepts the message if %A or %B is omitted. The reason why msgfmt does not recognize them is that the %A/%B codes are defined by the error handler (bfd.c around line 600). Meanwhile, msgfmt is only aware of the codes of printf. I see "/* Invoking %A with a null section pointer is an internal error. */", followed by abort(), which means that superficially valid translation files can very easily result in abort() or possibly buffer overruns. My recommendation is to use the same string codes as printf. Then faulty translations will be rejected by translationproject. I wrote a script to verify existing translations on the web page, and those that I tested had at least a few errors each. Best regards Ask 2016-10-20 12:47 GMT+02:00 Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com>: > Hi Ask, > >> Do you know when the translation >> templates on translationproject.org will be updated? > > On translationproject.org - no. But I have just updated the > bfd.pot template in the binutils source repository (which I > forgot to do yesterday, sorry). > > Cheers > Nick > _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
