hi， I’m newer. I found that symbols list results are different by using nm tool for binutils-2.24 and binutils-2.22. I see some sourcecode difference between binutils-2.24 and binutils-2.22, but have no idea of different sorting results for nm. The scene is as following: 1、The environment variable locale of host machine: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL= 2、If locale is set to POISX, the results are the same between binutils-2.22 and binutils-2.24. 3、If added �Cp, the results are also the same. 4、If added �Cn/-r/-s etc. or added the command “sort -option”, but the results are still different. Do not adjust anything in our project, so we don’t know how to deal with nm in binutils-2.24 to keep the same symbol list. The symbol list may be sorted using ASCII for binutils-2.22, could you tell me the nm difference between binutils-2.24 and binutils-2.22 ?
Thanks. esan wen [cid:image001.jpg@01D0F098.2F20FA50] 张 文 00219863 2012实验室-中央软件院 欧拉六部（编程技术LAB） 手机：15825507612 座机：0571631056 座位：杭州研究所Z9-3-B07R 我们的团队空间：http://3ms.huawei.com/hi/group/1502151
_______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
