https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19311
--- Comment #8 from Loria <Loria at phantasia dot org> --- I found a LLVM Bug, which seems to be at least correlated with the problem I a encountered: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24688 I will do some more checks, if it really is. since it is unknown how many times this bug hits the compiler generated, I would actually like to disable that type of optimization instead of changing the correct code to circumwent such compiler issue :/ you never know where it hits again :/ If the following change would help (will test): encode_arm_immediate (unsigned int val) { unsigned int a, i; for (i = 0; i < 32; i += 2) if ((a = rotate_left (val, i)) <= 0xff) return a | (i << 7); /* 12-bit pack: [shift-cnt,const]. */ return FAIL; } changed to: encode_arm_immediate (unsigned int val) { unsigned int a, i; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) if ((a = rotate_left (val, i*2)) <= 0xff) return a | (i << 8); /* 12-bit pack: [shift-cnt,const]. */ return FAIL; } or using the inline funktion instead of a macro ... Will test those. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
