https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Sriraman Tallam from comment #15) > > H.J. : Can we use Cary's idea to fix libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c to > make libgcc_s.so.1 do the right thing with gold too until this issue > is resolved in some manner? > You can pass -fuse-ld=bfd to build libgcc_s.so.1 on Linux: diff --git a/libgcc/config/i386/t-linux b/libgcc/config/i386/t-linux index 11bb46e..12aab16 100644 --- a/libgcc/config/i386/t-linux +++ b/libgcc/config/i386/t-linux @@ -3,4 +3,8 @@ # t-slibgcc-elf-ver and t-linux SHLIB_MAPFILES = libgcc-std.ver $(srcdir)/config/i386/libgcc-glibc.ver +# Work around gold bug: +# https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703 +SHLIB_LDFLAGS += -fuse-ld=bfd + HOST_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS += -mlong-double-80 -DUSE_ELF_SYMVER Or you have to make sure those symbols in both libgcc.a and libgcc.so.1 are correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
