https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804
--- Comment #7 from Andy Lutomirski <luto at mit dot edu> --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #6) > > This is probably a separate issue, but adding the comma causes: > > > > ld.gold: internal error in segment_precedes, at layout.cc:3037 > > Yes, that was PR 15355. It's fixed in binutils-2.24. > > It was probably caused by having two segments in the PHDRS clause with > the same type and flags -- what I've seen before is two PT_NULL > segments for vvar_sect and hpet_sect: > > vvar_sect PT_NULL FLAGS(4); /* PF_R */ > hpet_sect PT_NULL FLAGS(4); /* PF_R */ > > Ideally, instead of using PT_NULL for these segments, you could > allocate two new GNU-specific segment types. I think that would have > benefits elsewhere, where you can look for these segments by type > instead of having to infer which segment is which. > In this case I'm planning on just removing the segments entirely. They don't seem to serve any real purpose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
