https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804
Andy Lutomirski <luto at mit dot edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
--- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski <luto at mit dot edu> ---
Huh? I agree that your suggestion appears to work, but isn't gold supposed to
speak linker script language as spoken by GNU ld?
The de facto reference
(https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Output-Section-Description.html#Output-Section-Description)
says:
section [address] [(type)] :
[AT(lma)]
[ALIGN(section_align) | ALIGN_WITH_INPUT]
[SUBALIGN(subsection_align)]
[constraint]
{
output-section-command
output-section-command
...
} [>region] [AT>lma_region] [:phdr :phdr ...] [=fillexp]
The comma at the end is conspicuously absent.
Please either document or fix this. I realize that GNU ld is doing something
very strange with fillexp, but the fact that a single comma (but not two
commas!) is legal at the end of an output section description appears to be
completely undocumented.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
