http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15039
--- Comment #3 from C Rempel <cynt6007 at vandals dot uidaho.edu> 2013-01-28 00:31:58 UTC --- Thanks! ________________________________________ From: nickc at redhat dot com [sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 4:03 AM To: cynt6...@vandals.uidaho.edu Subject: [Bug gas/15039] 302-binutils-as-dwarf.patch http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15039 Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |nickc at redhat dot com Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2013-01-23 12:03:16 UTC --- Hi, I have committed the first part of the patch - including dwarf2dbg.h - but I have omitted the second part - the extra call to dwarf_emit_insn(0). I could see no reason for this second call, and it was not mentioned in your posting, so I have just assumed that it is a typo. If it is not, please could you let me know and I will consider applying that part of the patch too. Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
