------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-16 10:21
-------
Hi Timo,
> The only minor issue (just ignore it if you don't have extra time) I see is
> that
> the addresses are prefixed with one extra space so that addresses and other
> immediate values are not aligned in comments:
>
> 12c: 8d 33 cpi r24, 0x3D ; 61
> 12e: e0 f3 brcs .-8 ; 0x128
Yes, I was aware of this, but I was hoping that it might be regarded as a
feature - making addresses stand out.
> Btw, on x86 symbol names are not in comments ("call 18 <main+0x18>"), do you
> think that the output should be somehow harmonized to be similar on all
> architectures?
Yes - this whole body of code needs to be cleaned up and possibly rewritten, but
that will have to wait for when someone has lots of free time. :-)
Cheers
Nick
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4045
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
