------- Additional Comments From timo dot lindfors at iki dot fi 2007-02-16
10:17 -------
All three cases seem to work now, thanks!
The only minor issue (just ignore it if you don't have extra time) I see is that
the addresses are prefixed with one extra space so that addresses and other
immediate values are not aligned in comments:
12c: 8d 33 cpi r24, 0x3D ; 61
12e: e0 f3 brcs .-8 ; 0x128
130: 18 ba out 0x18, r1 ; 24
132: 19 be out 0x39, r1 ; 57
134: 1b ba out 0x1b, r1 ; 27
136: d4 cf rjmp .-88 ; 0xe0
where "; 0x128" would be preferred.
Btw, on x86 symbol names are not in comments ("call 18 <main+0x18>"), do you
think that the output should be somehow harmonized to be similar on all
architectures?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4045
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
