------- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-23 21:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=766)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=766&action=view)
generalise previous patch, depends on earlier MIPS-OPTIONAL patch
Welcome back, Nick,
> Excellent! I am a little bit hesitant to apply your patch as it is
> however since it adds target specific code to a file that is meant to be
> generic. Could you investigate changing your patch so that it adds a
> new elf backend function which can be called when an undefined symbol is
> encountered and which allows individual backends to decide if the symbol
> can be ignored ?
Mhmm, I actually wanted to avoid that since I don't have the slightest idea of
how bfd works. But I gave it a try anyway. Find the result attached for piping
to /dev/null. ;)
BTW: I compiled lots of stuff on my Octane with the binutils patched with the
earlier non-generic patch. All seems to work fine now, for example glib-2.8.3
with threading. make check completes 100% successful.
Cheers,
Micha
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #757 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
