------- Additional Comments From r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-12-21 16:32 ------- FYI
I build a toolchain using gcc-4.0.2 and binutils-2.16.1 patched with MIPS_OPTIONAL.patch and the binutils-2.16.1-elflink-optional-2.patch. gcc was configured with the following options: --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-libgcj --with-gmp=/appl/shared/gnu/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5 --with-mpfr=/appl/shared/gnu/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5 --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,f95,java,objc Using this toolchain I managed to compile the following packages: autoconf-2.13 autoconf-2.59 autogen-5.7.3 automake-1.9.6 bash-3.1 bison-2.1 bzip2-1.0.3 coreutils-5.93 db-3.3.11 db-4.3.28.NC dejagnu-1.4.4 diffutils-2.8.1 expat-1.95.8 expect-5.43 flex-2.5.4 gawk-3.1.4 gdbm-1.8.3 gettext-0.14.5 gmp-4.1.4 gperf-3.0.1 grep-2.5.1a guile-1.6.7 gzip-1.2.4a libtool-1.5.20 libxml2-2.6.22 m4-1.4.4 make-3.80 mpfr-2.2.0 ncurses-5.5 patch-2.5.4 pcre-6.3 perl-5.8.7 Python-2.3.5 Python-2.4.2 readline-5.1 sed-4.1.4 tar-1.15.1 tbcload tcl8.4.12 tetex-src-3.0 tk8.4.12 zlib-1.2.3 Did somebody else some tests using these binutils patches? Is there a chance that these patches will be applied? Rainer -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
