On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:14:38AM +0100, Chris Elvidge wrote:
> export PS1='\[${fcol[d]}${ecol[!!$?]}\][$?] \[${ucol[!!$(id
> -u)]}\]\h\[${fcol[b]}\]!\[${ucol[!!$(id -u)]}\]\u\[${fcol[w]}\]:(`tty|cut
> -d/ -f3-`):\D{%a %d %b %Y %I:%M %P %Z}:`pwd`\n\$\[${fcol[n]}\] '
>
> I somehow thought that [...] forced 'arithmetic context', so I tried it.
No, not in general.
> Are the two uses (array subscript and arithmetic context) of [...]
> connected/related? Or am I (stupidly) seeing a connection where none really
> exists?
An arithmetic context is created in (at least!) the following
situations (copied from
<https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashProgramming/05#Arithmetic_Expansion>):
* The $(( )) arithmetic substitution.
* The let or (( )) command.
* The index inside [ ] in an indexed array variable expansion.
* The start and length parameters in ${parameter:start:length} substitution.
* The [[ command with -gt or other numeric operators.
The deprecated $[ ] substitution falls into the same category as the
currently supported $(( )) syntax.
The [ character has several different meanings depending on where
and how it's used. It doesn't always indicate a math context. It's
also used for character classes in globs and regular expressions.
