On 06/06/2560 14:37, George wrote: > As it stands, it's possible in Bash to use bytes in the 0x80-0xFF range as > part of function names, for instance, because the Bash parser treats all of > these byte values as valid "word" characters. This makes the Bash parser > fairly "encoding neutral", which is why scripts using non-ASCII characters in > command names or function names work even if the script is run on a different > locale in current versions of Bash. Bash just ignores the issue, and > that works for a fair number of encodings.
Thanks for the elucidation. Sorry, my terminology was off. I meant to say, same glyphs, different encodings/locale. A TIS-620 encoded script works in UTF-8, like you said above. Peter
