On 10/31/14, 5:15 AM, Sami Kerola wrote:
> On 30 October 2014 20:14, Eduardo A. Bustamante López <dual...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Sounds the there is not much enthusiasm about making this sort of
>>> feature to work. This proposal belongs to archived never implemented
>>> ideas area. Good that effort wasting was kept minimal.
>> Remember that working patches are better than just requesting
>> features. There are lots of pending features that are requested more
>> frequently, so that's a lot of work for a single person to handle.
>
> I prefer first getting understanding if a feature is wanted, before
> starting to hack too much. My time has value to me. I don't want to
> spend it in writing a change that will be rejected. Neither I want to
> spend maintainer time to go through that sort of stuff. In other
> words; fail as fast & cheap way as possible is a good workflow.
OK. It doesn't sound like this feature is of general interest. Since
you can control when you open and close file descriptors, you might look
at $SECONDS when the file is opened and when it's closed and using the
difference to see how long it was open.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
