On 30 October 2014 20:14, Eduardo A. Bustamante López <dual...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sounds the there is not much enthusiasm about making this sort of >> feature to work. This proposal belongs to archived never implemented >> ideas area. Good that effort wasting was kept minimal. > Remember that working patches are better than just requesting > features. There are lots of pending features that are requested more > frequently, so that's a lot of work for a single person to handle.
I prefer first getting understanding if a feature is wanted, before starting to hack too much. My time has value to me. I don't want to spend it in writing a change that will be rejected. Neither I want to spend maintainer time to go through that sort of stuff. In other words; fail as fast & cheap way as possible is a good workflow. -- Sami Kerola http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
