On 17 March 2014 20:30, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > On 3/17/14 10:17 AM, Dave Rutherford wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> > wrote: > >> On 3/15/14 2:44 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > >>> On 15 March 2014 18:23, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu > >>> <mailto:chet.ra...@case.edu>> wrote: > >>> Is there a downside to making checkhash the default? > >> > >> Only the minor performance hit it would extract on every command lookup. > > > > Only on commands that were found in the hash table, correct? > > Yes, of course. I should have said every *successful* command hash table > lookup. This is much less of an issue now than when the option was first > added. >
OK, I misread the description, and thought it would only look the command up if the execution fails. Why can't that be done? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
