On 3/17/14 10:17 AM, Dave Rutherford wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
>> On 3/15/14 2:44 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2014 18:23, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu
>>> <mailto:chet.ra...@case.edu>> wrote:
>>> Is there a downside to making checkhash the default?
>>
>> Only the minor performance hit it would extract on every command lookup.
>
> Only on commands that were found in the hash table, correct?
Yes, of course. I should have said every *successful* command hash table
lookup. This is much less of an issue now than when the option was first
added.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
