Chet Ramey wrote: > Your vendor, which may be SuSE, has changed bash and shipped the modified > version. ---- Supposedly this has to do with memory corruption problems in 4.2 and the "possibility" that it might come back...
Is this likely to be a problem? Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > The patch belongs to memory corruption > ahd happen with several bug reports like: > > http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382214 > http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=384175 > > that is that after the siglongjmp() the bash had showed memory corruption. > This seems to be fixed in bash 4.2 ... nevertheless it could come back > again as memory management together with setjmp()/longjmp() or > sigsetjmp()/siglongjmp() has to managed thorough to not run into the > same problems as in the bugs above. > > This is the only reason why this patch is still alive. And yes I've read > the thread http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-bash@gnu.org/msg12269.html