On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Bob Proulx <b...@proulx.com> writes: > >> I say that somewhat tongue-in-cheek myself. Because sourcing files >> removes the abstraction barriers of a stacked child process and >> actions there can persistently change the current shell. Not good as >> a general interface for random actions. Normal scripts are better. > > You can still put the sourcing in a subshell if you don't want > persistent changes. ehe, or just "bash script"
- Re: Should this be this way? Chet Ramey
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Greg Wooledge
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Greg Wooledge
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Chris Down
- Re: Should this be this way? Chet Ramey
- Re: Should this be this way? Bob Proulx
- Re: Should this be this way? Andreas Schwab
- Re: Should this be this way? Pierre Gaston
- Re: Should this be this way? Sven Mascheck
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Chet Ramey
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Chet Ramey
- Re: Should this be this way? Linda Walsh
- Re: Should this be this way? Pierre Gaston
- Re: Should this be this way? Roman Rakus
- Re: Should this be this way? Pierre Gaston