> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:01:32AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > On 8/24/12 8:54 AM, Michal Soltys wrote:
> > > In case of single '=' operator used in [[ <expression> ]], rhs argument
> > > was treated as a pattern. Only == and != should treat rhs argument as a
> > > pattern, so this patch fixes it.
> > 
> > Incorrect; `=' and `==' are identical.
> 
> Perhaps he is assuming the man page is exhaustive.  The section for the
> [[ command only mentions the == and != operators:

Maybe.  The `CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS' section makes it clear they're identical.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Reply via email to