On 8/24/12 8:54 AM, Michal Soltys wrote:
> Not sure how savannah reports are followed, so small headups of a thing I
> experienced which probably is a bug. I made small bug report at
> https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?108110 - though obviously the behavior as
> described for '==' is valid (rhs is pattern).
>
> So what I suspected was that [[ <expression> ]] treated both = and == in the
> same way - and this seemed invalid, as for = it should be treated as a normal
> string - in the same way as for [ <expression> ] and test.
`=' and `==' are identical.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
