Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Why is [ 0 == 0 ] any more or less true than [ 0 -eq 0 ]? > > The problem seems to be that this line is missing from the function: > local n ret1 ret2
You're right about that. The OP and I conversed via email and resolved
his questions.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
