On 20 May 2016 at 15:58, Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 May 2016 at 00:04, Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> It is often easier to write expected-to-fail tests this way (so that > >> they can all look the same), rather than have to have, for example, an > >> extra driver that converts expected errors into success codes for the > >> automake test harness. > > > > What do you mean precisely by “an extra driver”? > > This would be a reference to a "custom test driver". > > https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Overview-of-Custom-Test-Drivers-Support.html#Overview-of-Custom-Test-Drivers-Support > Thanks, that's what I meant. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
