On 19 May 2016 at 00:04, Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > > It is often easier to write expected-to-fail tests this way (so that > > they can all look the same), rather than have to have, for example, an > > extra driver that converts expected errors into success codes for the > > automake test harness. > > What do you mean precisely by “an extra driver”? >
A custom test driver. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
