On 19 May 2016 at 00:04, Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote:

> > It is often easier to write expected-to-fail tests this way (so that
> > they can all look the same), rather than have to have, for example, an
> > extra driver that converts expected errors into success codes for the
> > automake test harness.
>
> What do you mean precisely by “an extra driver”?
>

​A custom test driver.​

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org

Reply via email to