"Paul D. Nelson" <[email protected]> writes: > Here I worry about repeated failures in a hot execution path (echoing > Al's earlier comment). Calling (require ...) is cheap once buframe is > loaded, but if buframe is nowhere to be found, then I don't think we > want 'preview--update-buframe' to repeatedly signal an error, right?
I think you're right. Actually, I'm not familiar enough with the new code in order to give a serious recommendation; I was hoping that Al chimes in with a fix 👋 Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
