Al Haji-Ali <[email protected]> writes: > We can do the following: > > - Add a setter code to `preview-at-point-placement` to require buframe > and issue an error if it's not available. > - To deal with the case of the variable being set directly (without > calling the setter code), we can issue an error and override the value > of preview-at-point-placement back to its default value to avoid > further errors. > > What do you think?
I think I have a preference for the latter; user could then still use `setq' and not `setopt'. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
