On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Dave Mielke on 2019/09/23 at 08:40 -0400] > > I'm reposting this question (of mine) under a new subject so as to solicit > general discussion. The issue is what should happen when using a contraction > table if a character isn't defined within that table. > > >That leaves us with a decision. We have three choices: > > > >1) The way it is now. Use the Unicode replacement character if it's defined, > else use all eight dots. > > > >2) Use the reaplcement character if defined, else do a text table looukp. This seems to me to be the most intuitive and flexible behaviour.
The only time when 1 might be preferable is during development/debugging of a contraction table. S.M. -- Sebastien Massy Montreal, Canada Website: http://www.wolfdream.ca Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/SMassy1 LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/sebastien-massy/47/5a5/81a _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
