[quoted lines by Dave Mielke on 2019/09/23 at 08:40 -0400]
I'm reposting this question (of mine) under a new subject so as to solicit
general discussion. The issue is what should happen when using a contraction
table if a character isn't defined within that table.
>That leaves us with a decision. We have three choices:
>
>1) The way it is now. Use the Unicode replacement character if it's defined,
else use all eight dots.
>
>2) Use the reaplcement character if defined, else do a text table looukp.
>
>3) Skip the replacement character and just do a text table lookup.
>
>Will one of these do or should we add a (probably rarely used) new selector for
>it?
--
I believe the Bible to be the very Word of God: http://Mielke.cc/bible/
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | WebHome: http://Mielke.cc/
EMail: [email protected] | Ottawa, Ontario | Twitter: @Dave_Mielke
Phone: +1 613 726 0014 | Canada K2A 1H7 |
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected]
For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
