+1 lgtm. After the protobuf goes in, it would be good if gives a tentative date for the beta release.
-Rakesh -----Original Message----- From: Sijie Guo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 01 July 2014 06:58 To: [email protected]; Flavio Junqueira Subject: Re: Release 3.4.0 +1 for the plan. - Sijie On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Flavio Junqueira < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 for the plan. I like the idea of a beta release. > > > -Flavio > > > > On Monday, June 30, 2014 1:14 PM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >Hi folks, > > > >Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0 > >out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think > >there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the > >protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start > >prepping a release. > > > >Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should > >explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the > >"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get > >4.3 to stable. > > > >Opinions? > > > >-Ivan > > > > > > >
