[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14017736#comment-14017736
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-765:
--------------------------------------
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-765
Patch
[0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-b.trunk.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12648323/0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-b.trunk.patch]
downloaded at Wed Jun 4 14:16:04 UTC 2014
----------------------------
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
120
. {color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
. {color:red}WARNING{color}: the current HEAD has 23 Javadoc warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
. {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1 FINDBUGS{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Findbugs
warnings
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
. Tests run: 920
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
. {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
{color:red}. There is at least one warning, please check{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk-precommit-build/652/
> bookkeeper script should fall back to java in path if JAVA_HOME is not set
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-765
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-765
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bookkeeper-server
> Reporter: Ivan Kelly
> Assignee: Ivan Kelly
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.3.0, 4.2.3
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-b.trunk.patch,
> 0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-back-to.patch
>
>
> The current behaviour requires JAVA_HOME to be set, which isn't set by
> default on all machines. So machines on which bookkeeper ran fine, no longer
> work.
> Solution is to fallback to java in path is JAVA_HOME not set.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
