[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14017013#comment-14017013
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-765:
--------------------------------------

Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-765


Patch 
[0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-back-to.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12648187/0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-back-to.patch]
 downloaded at Tue Jun  3 19:04:51 UTC 2014

----------------------------

{color:red}-1{color} Patch failed to apply to head of branch

----------------------------

> bookkeeper script should fall back to java in path if JAVA_HOME is not set
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-765
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: bookkeeper-server
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.3.0, 4.2.3
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-BOOKKEEPER-765-bookkeeper-script-should-fall-back-to.patch
>
>
> The current behaviour requires JAVA_HOME to be set, which isn't set by 
> default on all machines. So machines on which bookkeeper ran fine, no longer 
> work.
> Solution is to fallback to java in path is JAVA_HOME not set.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to