Hi Uwe, *, Am 26.05.21 um 20:42 schrieb Uwe Altmann: > Hi Andreas > > Am 26.05.21 um 20:23 schrieb Andreas Mantke: >> I'd expect that the DMS/CMS Plone could deliver about 90 % of the >> expected functionality within it's core code or within an add-on. The >> accessibility, stability and security also shouldn't be an issue. >> (https://plone.org/accessibility-info). And it's OSS software. > > So go on and feel free to make or arrange an offer covering /all/ the > described use cases and further specified requirements. Python is > labeled as preferred (because of [1]), not as required! thus I'm not a freelancer and not owner of a company I'm not able to bid on such a tender. I also not allowed to do such work within an additional business. > > Concerning Plone as platform: I tend to prefer something with a > slightly better bus factor [1] than our Plone experience has shown in > the past. But also here: Insights welcome. > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor
Maybe it's most easy to complain on this. I offered hands-on workshops with no interest from the TDF community in the past. The TDF admin team got a training from a Plone core developer some time ago. But there are other software with such Bus_factor in the project, but nobody is complaining about that (or not loudly / in public). Regards, Andreas -- ## Free Software Advocate ## Plone add-on developer ## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
