LGTM1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 11:38 AM Johann Hofmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone, a quick update: > > Thank you Martin for chiming in, I really appreciate your comment! I > updated the Chromestatus entry to reflect the browser signals more > accurately. > > I also sent a request for position > <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2022-June/032306.html> to > webkit-dev. > > Addressing Mike's and Daniel's concern about localized hot spots (sorry > for the delay): > > Looking at global usage data, it seems to be consistently low in all > countries. There are some regional differences, with Brazil, Croatia and > Belarus having slightly elevated usage at 0.2%, all likely subject to > randomness/noise as we're looking at a very small subset of data at this > point. We might be able to find out more about those during > deprecation, but overall I'm not very concerned. > > Thanks! > > Johann > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 1:49 AM Daniel Bratell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 2022-06-09 04:22, Martin Thomson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:55 PM Daniel Bratell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If Mozilla is already shipping this behaviour, then there is no need to >>> ask them if they support that change. We do assume that they approve of all >>> functionality they are shipping. >>> >> I want to address this point, as I think Chris Harrelson has done. Just >> because something ships in Firefox, that doesn't mean we think that it is >> good for the web. There's something of a long list of things we don't >> like, but ship for various reasons despite that. To pick an example that >> isn't particularly controversial, we still ship unsecured HTTP. >> >> So we do appreciate you asking directly rather than making inferences and >> then potentially misrepresenting our position. >> >> To save a bit of time on this bit of minutiae: this change is good and >> the work that Johann, Mike, and others on the Chrome team have done to >> improve compatibility with cookies is greatly appreciated. >> >> Correction appreciated! I was way too cavalier with that statement. >> >> /Daniel >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAD_OO4hs%2BgbCuXxWgOmVoVQ9zv9hRnnKYwi%2BMS9ciX76%3DVD%2Buw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAD_OO4hs%2BgbCuXxWgOmVoVQ9zv9hRnnKYwi%2BMS9ciX76%3DVD%2Buw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw9hv1%3DsbnTf_36t8%2B5dVC-N6iCA5aFznw6SHTB%2BpuySFA%40mail.gmail.com.
