On 2022-06-09 04:22, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:55 PM Daniel Bratell <[email protected]>
wrote:
If Mozilla is already shipping this behaviour, then there is no
need to ask them if they support that change. We do assume that
they approve of all functionality they are shipping.
I want to address this point, as I think Chris Harrelson has done.
Just because something ships in Firefox, that doesn't mean we think
that it is good for the web. There's something of a long list of
things we don't like, but ship for various reasons despite that. To
pick an example that isn't particularly controversial, we still ship
unsecured HTTP.
So we do appreciate you asking directly rather than making inferences
and then potentially misrepresenting our position.
To save a bit of time on this bit of minutiae: this change is good and
the work that Johann, Mike, and others on the Chrome team have done to
improve compatibility with cookies is greatly appreciated.
Correction appreciated! I was way too cavalier with that statement.
/Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/92317aa0-bb65-9f43-92c4-31fb3f0dd8b8%40gmail.com.
